Arthur C. Pillsbury
                          Foundation

Protecting and Preserving All Life -- By Extending Human Vision


Director-in-Chief Stephen Mather Finds the Means to Achieve His Goal - Arthur C. Pillsbury’s Nature Movies - 1915

      The first showing of Pillsbury films, accompanied by a lecture, outside of California was made to the National Press Club in Washington D.C. on October 21, 1915.  The event was instigated at the request of Stephen Mather, who would be named the first Director for the National Parks.  This event helped him achieve that goal. 
     The Washington Post reported, “Members of the National Press Club and their guests were taken on a tour of Yosemite National Park by Stephen T. Mather Arthur Pillsbury, the California photographer, with the help of the pictures taken by himself of this wonderful country from seemingly impossible points.  Mr. Pillsbury added to these pictures a description of the grandest playground in the world.”

Stephen T. Mather

  
The brief report goes on to mention, “At the conclusion of his lecture, Stephen T. Mather, Assistant Secretary of the Interior, in charge of national parks, spoke of the good roads movement now being conducted by his department.”   Mather was determined to establish himself as Director of a separate agency within the Department of the Interior to run the National Parks, but the roads movement was not led by Mather.  That movement, started in 1912, was started by Carl Fisher, and would result in the trans-continental Lincoln Highway.

         Coast to coast newspaper coverage, the hundreds of lectures, and thousands of theatrical motion picture presentations across the country made by Pillsbury showing the wonders of Nature and their connection with the establishment of the National Parks -- all was disappeared.  Today, these visuals are re-appearing on the Internet, descended from the inventions of Arthur C. Pillsbury.
        With the same show of conscience Mather exhibited towards the employer he defrauded, Francis Marion Smith, aka the "Borax King" or "Borax Smith", of Pacific Coast Borax.  Mather and his partner, Thomas Thorkildsen, would end up with the equivalent of $500,000,000 from stealing Smith’s clients, carried out by Mather while still working for Smith.  Mather would claim part of his resentment was not being compensated, over and above his generous salary, for adding the words, “Twenty Mule Team Borax” to the image of a team already on Smith’s product. MORE; In like manner, Mather contributed to the death of David Curry, who Mather attempted to drive out of business, so Mather’s Desmond Park Service Company (DPSC) could have a monopoly in Yosemite Park.
      Mather, looking for the means to become the first Director of the yet unfounded National Park Service immediately realized Pillsbury’s films could get him what he wanted.  He would use the inspiring films Pillsbury created to gain his own end.  Not able to understand the genius which had make Pillsbury’s inventions possible, Mather viewed him as a talented photographer who he could dominate and control.  It was after he had launched his campaign for the National Parks that Mather realized he had miscalculated.  Then, when Mather realized he could not control him because of the exploding, nation-wide impact of Pillsbury’s work on public policy and culture; Mather took steps to eliminate him both from Yosemite and from History.  This took place through his contacts, re-attribution of Pillsbury’s stolen surviving work to others, and by arranging to burn Pillsbury out of Yosemite, removing the Pillsbury Collection of negatives.  Mather’s arsonist burned the Pillsbury operation in Yosemite which included a 60’ x 40’ Studio, Nature Center and a motion picture theater with seating for 375 people.
       It is a first measure of the power of the elites who founded the National Park System, that Mather was able to accomplish this without detection for nearly a century.  His methods used to render someone well-known and respected, a non-person, is the first lesson to be learned from this story, which is essential for understanding media today. 
          Positioning himself with the new wave of control, manipulating all of the functions of American government, to force, by law, monopolies of land, utilities like the Bell System, currency and banking with the Federal Reserve System, and even aviation. For Mather to secure the power for which he hungered, which included land-swaps for extractive industries.   Mather ironically wanted Pillsbury’s technological approach to connecting people to Nature, as the means to accomplish his goal.  More on this is now being researched and confirmed.
          Pillsbury had shown his Nature films after dark in Yosemite from the porch of his Studio of the Three Arrows, starting in 1909.  The next year, this became a regular event taking place several times each week.  His movies were already being shown as short features in movie theaters.  Pillsbury’s goal was to remove the institutional limitations then already in place, to keep Americans from understanding the Natural World, of which they were a part.  The goals of the two men were polar opposites. 

  

  1977 - Dr. Arthur Francis Pillsbury becomes aware of his father’s eradication from History

My father, Dr. Pillsbury, had been unsure History was being rewritten until he received the Sargent book as a gift 1977.
     In the February 9, 1978, letter to Harrison, Dr. Pillsbury says that on one trip back to Yosemite to share his childhood memories with his children, myself included, Dr. Pillsbury was told by an employee of the Best Studio that, “there was a strong effort to play down Uncle’s role in the development of Yosemite.  I never did check up on that charge.”  These events, the book and the comment, caused Dr. Pillsbury to reflect on events which took place early in his life. 
      Harrison responded with a letter dated February 13, 1978
​asking first, “Nearly anything about he and your aunt will
  

L - R:  Virginia Best, Grace Pillsbury, Winkey, Ellen Boysen and ?

 be of importance.  Any daily routines, habits, customs, values, special events, would be worth hearing about.”   Harrison never comments or asks about Dr. Pillsbury’s concern or about Sargent’s book, which carefully edges around Pillsbury’s work in the Valley.
        In Yosemite Valley, the campaign to denigrate Arthur C. Pillsbury was well launched and being carried out by someone Dr. Pillsbury thought he could trust, an old childhood friend, Virginia Best Adams.  


  
November 1927 - The Destruction of the Pillsbury Studio in Yosemite

In his February 13, 1978 letter, Harrison gets specific, asking, “What was your Uncle’s emotional reaction to the burning of the studio in Yosemite? Did he ever talk about it?  Did he or anyone else ever suggest it might have been intentionally set?”  Dr. Pillsbury had mentioned it having taken place in 1927 in his short response to the previous letter written by Harrison. 
          Harrison goes on to say, placatingly, “Everyone I have corresponded with in Yosemite speaks very warmly and highly of him.” I, Melinda Pillsbury-Foster, was sure this was true because I had exactly the same experience.  Two specific incidents of this were, first, a comment by a professional photographer in Los Angeles whom I met when he was photographing candidates for whom I was managing campaigns in 1982.  He asked if I was related to Arthur C. Pillsbury. He told me he was a great man.  The tone in his voice was filled with reverence.  Later, I was very sorry I did not follow up and keep in touch with him. Like Dad, I was busy with other things.  
         In the early 1990s, after my Father, Dr. Pillsbury, was dead, I called Leroy Radanovich, the photographer responsible for handling the photographic work for Yosemite for decades in the late 20th Century and into the 21st, to ask about having some photos reproduced from the Yosemite Research Library.  After he said, “Hello?” I got right down to business.  I said, “This is Melinda Pillsbury-Foster and I need some photos printed.”  There was a pause, then Leroy said, “Your Grandfather was a great photographer.”  I responded with, “Thank you.”  At which Leroy said, sounding stunned, “You really are his grand-daughter?”  Grandfather’s work had that kind of impact despite the fact he had been dead for most of a century. 
         The exchange between Harrison and Dr. Pillsbury began in early 1978, a half century after the Pillsbury Studio was lost.   
            Dr. Pillsbury offered nothing more on the issue of the fire.   Dr. Pillsbury’s father, AC, had returned only briefly to the Valley to get personal items from the cottage where he lived while in the Valley.  His son, Dr. Pillsbury, then 23, had traveled at the request of his father to the Valley later, finalizing the sale of his father’s Studio and the concession, to the Yosemite Park & Curry Company (YP&CC);  then run by Donald Tresidder, who had married Mary Curry, and forced out Foster Curry, Mary’s brother, by 1921. MORE on Foster    Both were the children of David and Jeannie Curry, the founders.
         But questions were awakening.  During the correspondence with Harrison, Dr. Pillsbury would experience a revelation. 
At the time of the fire, November 1927, Dr. Pillsbury was a student at Stanford University majoring in Civil Engineering and planning to enter the PhD program there after graduation.  Dr. Pillsbury carried out his father’s request in January of 1928.  Father, Dr.  Pillsbury, married immediately after graduation from his father’s home.  June 24, 1933 Clipping
      On February 14,1978, Dr. Pillsbury responded with a nine-page letter with recollections of his father and life in the Valley.  Since 1974, the days before Valentine’s Day had been a sad time for everyone in the Pillsbury family.  On February 12th that year, Carol Sylvia, Dr. and Mrs. Pillsbury’s second daughter, had died suddenly of a heart attack at age 36 just before she was to come see them to celebrate her birthday.  Writing the letter, he later told his youngest daughter, Melinda, his writing had taken his mind off the heartache.
     A heaviness began to grow in Dr. Pillsbury’s mind.  What could he do to ensure the father he loved, would be remembered for what he had created? 
 

  1928 - A Mistaken Promise for Secrecy Made
     On February 16, 1978, Dr. Pillsbury again wrote to Harrison, saying, “There was never a suggestion by anyone that the fire that burned Uncle’s studio had been deliberately set.  Certainly, Uncle never suggested it nor did his manager whose name, I believe, was Everett (Tommy) Tompkins.” The letter then goes on to detail Tompkin’s removal to Oakland and his new job at a photographic store and the comment, “if he were alive today he would be a good 85 years of age.” 
     Dr. Pillsbury had made a promise to Virginia not to mention the story relayed to him by Tompkins, during his visit to Yosemite Valley in early 1928 to arrange for the disposal of the property.  Harrison’s letters to Dr. Pillsbury slow down to one a month, then they stop from June until October 5, 1978.

The Pillsbury Studio, New Village - 1927                            R - New Best Studio

         Dr. Pillsbury’s first action in 1928, as a young man returning to Yosemite Valley, was to find Tommy Tompkins to hear what he had to say about the fire.  His father had not talked about the fire during their phone call. 

The Call – Late 1990 

        Dr. Pillsbury, my father, told me, Melinda Pillsbury-Foster, about this event in the late autumn of 1990.  Father had given up on Harrison, finally, to my relief and that of my brother, Charles. During this time, we hoped Harrison might be able to handle writing the book Father wanted about Grandfather.  Both of us had our doubts, however.  Father had shared with me, and I believe also with Charles, the issues posed to Harrison in Father’s January 21st 1985 letter, which included this, “On our trip to Yosemite last November, I realized I had been blind to what should have been obvious.  In the serious fire which had taken place in 1927, Uncle had lost all of his negative(s).  To him this was irrepairable.   Included were the negatives of his trip to Alaska, and the many pictures he took of the San Francisco fire and earthquake, the many pictures throughout Yosemite National Park, and other places in the west. Replacing them must have seemed like an impossible task.  “Tommy” Thompson (sic) called me about it at Stanford late in 1927, and told me he had already been in contact with Uncle, but he did not mention the loss of the negatives.  Uncle was on his winter lecture tour. When he returned, he sold the studio and concession to the Yosemite Park & Curry Company.  And when I saw him he was bubbling over with plans to build a new studio in the Berkeley hills on Keith Ave.”
           As he had always done, Arthur C. Pillsbury remained up-beat and confident he could handle any eventuality.  He had done so alone on his 2,600-mile journey down the Yukon River as he photographed the opening of the mining towns.  But this time he would be fighting forces he could not see who were following an agenda for control, which, today has grown almost beyond the control of Americans.

Father was coming to his own epiphanies, independently. 

        Harrison had responded to the agonized letter of January 21 1985 with two cheery post cards, one sent on March 31, 1985 and the other on September 29, 1985.  The latter post card read, “A belated thank you for the outline of “Uncle’s” life.  I enjoyed reading it and I am glad you wrote it down.  Thanks too for the d’orotone, I have it hanging on the wall at work.”   Harrison does not response to two more ‘notes’ from Dr. Pillsbury. 
        Harrison then sends another cheery postcard to Dr. Pillsbury, dated September 1, 1986, which reads, “Dear Art, Thank you for your two notes this past spring.  I’m sorry it took so long for me to send my thanks.  The Placer County newspaper is of interest – looks like he had an early interest in bicycles.  Hope all is well with you.  I fondly remember my visit to Springville.  Best Wishes, Steve”  On November 27th 1988
       It has been ten years since the Pillsbury Collection, for which the family has been searching since 1946, has been located. 
      Harrison had finally answered Father’s last letter.  This letter mentioned a book, “West of Eden: A History of the Art and Literature of Yosemite” by David Robertson, published August 1, 1984.  The book ignored the entire history of Pillsbury in Yosemite Park.  Harrison ignored the reference, with which he was likely familiar.   Again, he picked up the possibility of beginning work on a book, and again stalled.  Finally, Harrison mentioned the Pillsbury Collection in Utah.  First, he evades the issue of how the collection ended up in Utah.  “Your offer to have something on “Uncle” published is greatly appreciated.  I still have all of my notes but have done little work since we moved to St. Louis in 1980.  One of the hold ups from that time was the discovery of a large Pillsbury Collection in Utah.  It was in private hands when I first heard about it but was then acquired by Brigham Young University. They agreed to process it quickly so I could complete my research but then several years passed.   The collection is the largest Pillsbury collection I know of. It contains a variety of photographic material from throughout his career (Alaska to the Fiji Islands) and a good deal of his personal papers. I am not sure how it ended up in Utah and am not certain BYU is the best place for it.  I would not feel good about writing anything about Pillsbury until I can research in the collection.”
      Harrison was not only aware of the Collection but was told about its discovery by Virginia Adams, having learned about it from her husband, Ansel.  These events began in October, 1978 and continued until the Harrison had missed the opportunity to buy the collection for Adams in mid-1979.  This marked the end of the on-going correspondence with Dr. Pillsbury by Harrison. 
      As far as I know, Father did not respond to Harrison’s letter of November 27, 1988 but they might have been using the phone.  Harrison had withheld the location of the Pillsbury Collection from Dr. Pillsbury for ten years!   Father was angry, though he did not say very much.  But after this he began asking me to help him, as I was writing family history as I dug into genealogy.
    Harrison sent another letter with a contract for Father to sign, dated January 21, 1990.   The balance of their communications took place by phone, from what Father told me. I reviewed the contract Harrison sent after Father died and communicated with him briefly.  One of those calls Harrison demanded $5,000 from me for his past research.  I declined the offer.   I had not read the correspondence with Harrison until some years later.  What time I had was spent traveling to locations to do research the old-fashioned way.  During my own visit to the Pillsbury Collection at BYU I found there were over 5,000 stills in this small remainder of AC Pillsbury’s life’s work.  This does not take into account his films, of which few were present. 
      Over the years from Father’s death to 2014, I had several conversations with Harrison.  During these, he told me he had sold the d’orotones from Father to make a down payment on his house in North Carolina.
      Harrison had no intention of writing a book.  He was sent by the Adams Family, first to see if Father had revealed what you are about to read below, and second to obtain the Pillsbury Collection for their own use. 
      When Father died on April 12, 1991, I was still reeling from the call below, stunned, confused and outraged.